Skip to main content

Avoid forest conversion to non-forest

Approach

Forests are the largest carbon sink in the United States. The high carbon densities of forest ecosystems relative to other terrestrial ecosystems are a result of carbon stocks in both aboveground biomass and significant belowground carbon stored as soil organic matter. Conversion of forested lands to other non-forest land uses can result in large losses of carbon in both live and dead trees, which comprise about 60% of the carbon in a mature forest. Additionally, removal of the canopy can increase decomposition of the litter layer and soil, further decreasing carbon pools. Conversion of forests to row crop agriculture, pasture, or development represent the largest loss of forests in the United States.

Tactics

  • Designation of conservation easements on forested land.
  • The use of protective guidelines, such as best management practices, that avoid unintentional loss of forest cover or soil carbon.
  • Reducing the amount of forest that is displaced for forest management activities (e.g. designing road systems or landings to minimize their footprint).

Strategy

Strategy Text

Carbon stocks often reach their highest density in forested ecosystems compared to other ecosystem types or land uses. Actions that maintain the integrity of forested ecosystems or re-establish forest cover can have some of the most significant benefits for maintaining carbon in both above- and belowground pools, as well as improving the ability of the ecosystems to sequester carbon into the future. This strategy seeks to sustain or enhance carbon stocks at broad spatial scales through maintaining forest vegetation, increasing forest stocking, or re-establishing forest cover on non-forested lands.

Todd A Ontl, Maria K Janowiak, Christopher W Swanston, Jad Daley, Stephen Handler, Meredith Cornett, Steve Hagenbuch, Cathy Handrick, Liza Mccarthy, Nancy Patch, Forest Management for Carbon Sequestration and Climate Adaptation, Journal of Forestry, Volume 118, Issue 1, January 2020, Pages 86–101, https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz062

RELATED TO THIS APPROACH:

Resource Area

Relevant Region

Midwest
Northeast