This project is assessing the economic costs and benefits of implementing soil health practices (particularly, cover crops and no-tillage) on Northeast and North Central US agriculture. It leverages data from long-term agricultural research projects that include treatments with soil health building practices.
Practices that build soil health such as cover cropping and conservation tillage can improve crop resilience to increased drought and precipitation events. In addition, improved soil health could increase crop yields while removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, these benefits may only begin to be realized after 5-20 years, and there is limited information on the economic impact of implementing soil health practices over time. This information is critical to broaden farmer adoption.
An initial literature review revealed limited available information, especially in the Northeast, regarding the economic dimensions of soil health practices, which highlights the need for this work. Peer reviewed economic research from the project has found that cover crops enhance resilience to extreme weather and may be an effective adaptation strategy to climate change by mitigating the effects of excessive soil moisture. The researchers also found that no-tillage management increases profitability by reducing costs compared to similar tilled crop rotations and relative profitability increases the longer no-tillage has been implemented. On-going research is similarly assessing the relative costs and returns when including cover crops and cover crop mixtures in grain crop rotations.
Publications
-
Economics of soil health management systems that sequester carbon: key research needs for the Northeastern United States
Rejesus, Roderick M.; Aglasan, Serkan; Knight, Lynn G.; Cavigelli, Michael A.; Dell, Curtis J.; Lane, Erin D.; Hollinger, David Y. 2024. Economics of soil health management systems that sequester carbon: key research needs for the Northeastern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-217. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 27 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-217.
Long-term economic impacts of no-till adoption
Che, Y., R.M. Rejesus, M.A. Cavigelli, K.E. White, S. Aglasan, et al. 2023. Long-term economic impacts of no-till adoption. Soil Security 13: 100103. doi: 10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100103.
Cover crops, crop insurance losses, and resilience to extreme weather events
Aglasan, S., R.M. Rejesus, S. Hagen, and W. Salas. 2023. Cover crops, crop insurance losses, and resilience to extreme weather events. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. doi: 10.1111/ajae.12431.
Economic dimensions of soil health practices that sequester carbon: Promising research directions
Rejesus, R.M., S. Aglasan, L.G. Knight, M.A. Cavigelli, C.J. Dell, et al. 2021. Economic dimensions of soil health practices that sequester carbon: Promising research directions. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 76(3): 55A-60A. doi: 10.2489/jswc.2021.0324A.
Media
-
Economic Impacts of No-Till Adoption in Maryland [Factsheet]
Researchers and agricultural producers believe that economic concerns are one of the largest barriers to adopting no-till management practices. A recent MidAtlantic study involving long-term data has found that over time, net returns (or profits) per acre can be greater for no-till compared to conventional tillage. The study identifies what inputs are affected by no-till adoption, providing more information about the sources of profit between long-term no-till use and conventional tillage. It also suggests that no-till profitability can increase under continued use over time.
Soil Health - What about the economics?
A new research study “Economic dimensions of soil health practices that sequester carbon: promising research directions”, examines costs and benefits of soil health practices that sequester carbon.